Sunday, October 28, 2018

Risk vs. Recklessness

We live in a safety-obsessed culture.  Playgrounds no longer have most of the features that were my childhood favorites.  I spent many happy hours spinning in circles on tire swings and roundabouts that can no longer be found on today's playgrounds.  Seesaws are a thing of the past.  Most schools have removed their swingsets, so we will see if my mom was right when she told us you can't grow right if you don't swing on swingsets.  Every time I find out a beloved piece of playground equipment is now banned, I wonder how long it will be before we wrap the kids in bubble wrap and roll them around the playground.



Don't get me wrong; I'm not against safety.  But, the point of playgrounds is to teach children how to take risks.  Why, you may ask, should kids learn to take risks?  I'm so glad you asked.  Risk is how we grow as a culture.  Risk is how the human race has progressed.  We made fire, explored the west, crossed Antarctica, invented electricity, and flew in space - all risky activities.  All of those things have been possible because human beings were willing find something more valuable than safety.

I'm concerned that the generation in front of us has been raised with such safety-conscious decisions that they have not learned the difference between risk-taking and recklessness.  Because they aren't learning it in other ways, I have this conversation with my 8th-graders when we learn about space travel and with my physics students when discussing the Manhattan Project.  When I ask my 8th-graders to evaluate the wisdom of a manned mission to Mars, about one-third of my students object to it on the basis of safety.  They say things like, "We should not go unless it can be guaranteed to be completely safe" and, "No one should risk their lives" and "We should only go when it can be 100% risk-free."  This is an unreasonable level of expectation for anything.  I remind them that sports are not 100% safe (There's a running ambulance at every game for a reason).  Driving a car isn't completely without risk, but we drive anyway.  Some of my physics students say that the scientists of the Manhattan project were not reckless because they were just doing what they had been told to do.  It seems my students have some conflicting thoughts about safety, risk, and recklessness; so I think these are important discussions to have with them.

Reckless, according to the Miriam Webster Dictionary, is "a lack of proper caution, careless of consequences, and irresponsible."  It defines risk as "a chance of loss and the possibility of loss or injury."  In short, it seems the recklessness is just risk without care or preparation for consequences.

Sports, as I mentioned before, involves risk.  That does not make those who play it reckless because they have conditioning, training, and procedures for the possible consequences.  Driving is the daily use of a 3000-pound piece of metal with combustible fluids firing up through the entire trip.  Is it reckless?  No.  You have been trained in safety techniques, and the car has been equipped with seat belts and airbags.  We, as a society, have decided that these mitigate the risk enough to make quick transportation worth handling a moving machine.  These are things we do every day that involve risk but are not necessarily reckless.

We should not be reckless, but we cannot move forward without risk.  It's important that we teach students the difference so that progress doesn't stop in the name of safety.

Sunday, October 21, 2018

Defining Impact as Building a Legacy

I had planned to write about something different this week, but I saw this video a few days ago, and it will not let me go.  I'm in my car, on the way to church, and a line from this pops into my head.  I'm reading a book or watching tv, and the kind way this man is addressing the issue with millennials comes to mind.  It's 15 minutes long, but watch it, even if it means not reading the rest of this post.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hER0Qp6QJNU

I could write a ten-part series based on this video, from the neurological consequences of telling a child they are perfect and special to the fallout of giving kids what they want as soon as they want it.  I could write about the influence of technology and the trap of instant gratification or how your mom can't get you a promotion.  I could write about the trauma of being unfriended or the fact that we have age restrictions on other addictive and potentially damaging things.  I may write about those someday, but there is a small part of this video that just keeps rolling around in my mind enough that I wanted to process my thoughts about it here.

The part that keeps coming back to me is about nine minutes in, where he talks about people who want to quit their job after only a few months because they aren't "making an impact."  I teach students who use this word a lot (and in a school that has the word in our mission statement).  I truly believe they are sincere when they say they want to make an impact.  However, much like the people who want to be famous or parents who just want their kids to be happy, lack of definition makes this difficult to achieve.

In the video, Simon Sinek describes it this way, "It's as if they're standing at the foot of a mountain, and they have this abstract concept called impact that they want to have in the world, which is the summit.  What they don't see is the mountain.  I don't care if you go up the mountain quickly or slowly, but there's still a mountain."  This is such a perfect description of the issue.  Those who climb Everest certainly do it for the view at the top, but they certainly wouldn't find it as meaningful if a helicopter dropped them onto the summit.  The messy and difficult journey matters. 

In addition, what if there were no way to tell when you had reached the summit of a mountain.  You could succeed and not know or be frustrated by constantly climbing without knowing what you are climbing toward.   A word like "impact" is not a goal because there's no way to know when you have achieved it.  I was listening to a great TED talk about how unhappy kids are whose parents' goal is their happiness.  When the goal of parents was that their kids become good citizens, there was a way to know if you had been successful.  Did your child have a job, contribute to the economy, serve a neighbor, vote, and pay their taxes?  You had raised a good citizen.  The happiness goal is just too elusive to know if you have achieved it.  What is happy?  Are they happy enough?  Are they happy about the right things? (I mean, there are probably identity thieves who are happy with their work.) . This idea that a person's job should be one in which they have an impact is similar.  What kind of impact? (Because again, an identity thief is making an impact.)  In what way do you want the impact to happen?  How far do you want your impact to reach?  It's all just too mushy to be a goal.

One more problem.  "Impact" is a word that sounds like it's something that happens fast.  Earthquakes have impact.  Wars have impact.  A punch to the face has impact.  It's a sudden result.  What Simon Sinek is trying to communicate is that you cannot reach the summit without climbing the mountain.  That process may difficult, non-linear, and long.  Most people who are out there, sincerely hoping to make "an impact" are frustrated that it doesn't happen after each action.  They don't see making an impact as a lifelong activity; they see it as something they can accomplish after a week of trying.

Let me humbly suggest that we change our language a bit.  What we really mean when we say we want to have an impact is that we want to do something that matters.  We want to make a change in the world.  We want to build a legacy.  Perhaps we should change the way we speak to high school and college students to this language, the language of building.  Doesn't the image of building something communicate so much more about the process than the word impact?  A person who enters their career with building something in mind will find fare more fulfillment in the process of learning and doing their job than the person who goes in expecting to make a quick and sudden difference. 

Let's focus on building something and enjoy the messy, difficult, interesting, and growing process that is.


Sunday, October 14, 2018

Teaching Students Empathy

Lack of empathy may be the world's biggest problem right now.  You might not think this if you read a lot of Twitter arguments.  Someone always says, "How would you feel if . . ." and while that sounds empathetic, the motivation is to win the argument.  That's not empathy.  It the same old selfishness disguised as compassion.  A wolf in sheep's clothing is not a sheep, and the person who pretends compassion is not compassionate.   

We are so polarized that the very idea of what someone else thinks or feels is offensive to us, so we carefully cultivate our world (friending and unfriend, following and unfollowing) to hear as little as possible from those with whom we disagree.  Whether the issue is immigration, racial injustice, the waitress serving our table more slowly than we would like, or a rival athletic team, we don't want to imagine "the other side" as human beings with their own thoughts and feelings.

Anyone who has been in education longer than a day knows that we aren't just responsible for teaching content.  We also teach life skills, study skills, thinking abilities, and engage in character development.  If we are going to fulfill our mission with students, we must find ways to teach empathy.  Here are a few ways that I've seen in my own school.  Please share what you do in yours.

Project Construction:
When GRACE teachers construct projects, we often think of ways to broaden student thinking to take others into account.  One of our English teachers partnered her class with a class from another school.  They engaged in a Twitter chat about "the American dream."  Our students heard stories and viewpoints they otherwise would not have.  Fifth-grade students learning about the Holocaust were assigned roles as Jews and wore stars of David, had restrictions on which doors and water fountains they were allowed to use in order to experience what it feels like to be isolated and limited for no reason.  Physics students are assigned a region of the world to research and asked to propose the solution to a problem that engineering could help solve.  They are required to use the available resources of the area, not swoop in with a western solution.  Our AP Statistic students collect and analyze data for local non-profits.  These are only a few examples.  If you walk through the halls of either campus, you will see projects that encourage empathy development.

Modeling Empathy in Our Interactions
For all the planned activities teachers and students engage in, the vast majority of our day involves unplanned conversation.  When a student asks a question, it means they are open to a change in thinking.  The way we answer them matters.  Do we treat the question like an interruption to our plan, or do we remember what it was like to not understand?  When a student complains about another teacher, do we let it go or do we ask them to think about why that teacher might have done that?  What might that teacher have been thinking?  When a student says something mean or insensitive, do we simply punish or does our discipline involve asking that student to put themselves in the other students' position?  All of these unplanned interactions reveal how we think, which students notice.

Community Service
My school requires students to complete a certain number of community service hours for graduation, but we want them to view service more deeply than that.  The hope is that the requirement will expose them to a variety of service organizations and opportunities ranging from local thrift stores to Habitat for Humanity to food service organizations.  In a time of slacktivism, when many believe they have made a difference by using a hashtag or putting a banner on their Instagram profile, we want our students to really engage in service by investing their time.   Many of our students find that one of those opportunities ignites a passion for service and become active because of the intrinsic motivation to help others. 

Writing Opportunities
I've often said that English teachers know their students better than anyone else because they read so much of their writing.  I know I said things in essays that I didn't talk about in other places.  It's just hard to write without putting something of yourself into it.  But English teachers don't need to be the only people who provide students with these opportunities.  It will look different in the different areas of discipline, but you can craft questions and writing prompts that both lead to mastery of content, use of Bloom's evaluation level thinking skill (yes, I know it's not on the new Bloom's but it still matters), and empathy.  History teachers can ask their students to write as a suffragette or a soldier in the Civil War.  Science teachers can ask their students to evaluate the application of scientific discoveries (nuclear power v. nuclear weapons) from the perspective of Neils Bohr and/or a citizen of Japan.  Foreign language teachers probably have more opportunities than anyone to introduce their students to the thinking of people different from themselves.  If you don't want it to be in the form of writing, that's fine.  They can accomplish the same in a skit, video, song, debate, or any other creative way you can think of.

The Arts 
Every study about arts education shows that whether it is theater, dance, visual art, or music, students who participate in the arts have an increased level of empathy.  While it is risky to assume reasons from statistical data, they do prompt us to ask why the numbers are what they are.  I'm not an arts educator (just an enthusiastic supporter), but as I've read about these studies, it seems most arts educators agree that the increase in empathy results from trying to portray the creative work of others (band music students are usually performing the work of another) and also trying to get others to understand their own message (visual arts and dance are often putting out original work).  Some curriculum includes both.  You can see how the development of empathy would happen even if it weren't a specific goal of the curriculum.  When it is a specific goal, the result is practically magical, as I got to see yesterday.

Yesterday, I attended our school's fall play.  While I have enjoyed and been entertained by every play we have done, I've never been more impressed by my students as much as I was with this one.  The play is called Women and War.  My students stepped into the shoes of Vietnam nurses, gold star mothers, war protestors, wives waiting for their husbands to return from Korea, WWII soldiers writing to their girl at home, and those who served in other capacities (like phone operators and USO girls).  They portrayed worry, sadness, anger, joy, and PTSD.   Their preparation involved more than memorizing lines and learning stage blocking.  They read dozens of articles, visiting the WWI immersive exhibit at our local museum, interviewed an air force reservist, and attempted to truly interpret the intent of the playwright.  The result was a theatre experience unlike any I've seen in a high school.  In the audience, you could have heard a pin drop.  There was none of the shifting around, moving to restrooms, and talking between scenes that have become relatively normal at plays (even though they shouldn't).  The only sounds were those of sniffles from people who had been moved to tears.  When the lights went it out, there was a beat before the applause began, and even then, it was quieter applause than normal.  The audience needed that moment as they moved from experiencing the characters and their stories to remembering that they were an audience.  There was empathy in the audience, but it was because there was empathy on that stage.  For the two dozen cast and crew of this play, Veteran's Day will not be the same.  Neither will their studies of history class or trips to DC.  Once empathy has been achieved, it marks their hearts.



Like anything else, there is no "one size fits all" method.  Writing will not successfully build empathy in all students; neither will community service.  Both methods will reach some.  Projects are not going to open all of their eyes, but participation in the arts might.  If each method reaches some, the cumulative effect will be powerful.  Do as many as you can wherever it fits in the context of your school.

Sunday, October 7, 2018

Twitter as a PD Tool

The first time I got on Twitter, I didn't get what the fuss was about.  It seemed like Facebook for people with ADHD (This was back when it was still only 140 characters).  I also felt pressured to post every time I changed activities.  "I am teaching a class.  I am teaching another class.  I am eating lunch."  This was too much pressure for me, and I deleted my account.  I just wasn't getting anything out of it that I was already getting from Facebook, and I felt silly posting twice.

Then, I attended a teacher's conference at which an art teacher made the case for Twitter as a professional development tool.  I wasn't sure if I agreed, but I thought I should give it a fair shake.  I created another account and cultivated who I followed more carefully than I had the first time.  Instead of the same friends and family that I already had on Facebook, I chose to follow educators and scientific sources.  It still took me a while to develop an appreciation for Twitter, but it was a much different user experience than the scattershot method I was using the first time.

That was five years ago.  While I haven't been perfectly disciplined about keeping my follows purely about education and science (I follow a few things for no other reason than the joy they bring, like @dog_feelings and @nocontextpawnee), I have developed a great deal of momentum making Twitter a tool of professional learning.  Here are a few accounts I recommend to you.  The first list is for all teachers.  The second focuses on science.

Education List
@Wikipedia ‏- I've only been following them a few weeks, and I'm already glad I do
@davestuartjr ‏- He's a teacher with much wisdom to share.
@SteeleThoughts ‏- An Alabama MS principal.  If you aren't following him, you aren't as encouraged as you could be.
@TalksWTeachers ‏- Links to their podcast.
@TEDTalks ‏- If you don't know why, you don't know TED.
@pbsteachers - Some digital resources 

Science List
@NatlParkService ‏- Beautiful pictures, historical facts about America's best idea 
@SlowMotionGuys ‏- I teach a lot of science through slow motion video
@TheCrashCourse ‏ - Actually, this is for more than just science.  They have many grade channels.
@NASA_Astronauts ‏- They post photos from the space station.  Well worth following.
@scifri ‏- The twitter account of NPR's Science Friday with Ira Flatow
@NASA ‏- Always great, but especially awesome as we approach the 50th anniversary of the moon landings.
@ScienceNews ‏and @sciam ‏- Good articles on current science topics
@Fermilab ‏and @CERN ‏- While they are good for the occasional article, it's their photos that make them fun to follow.

Try some of these out, and if there are any that aren't giving you beneficial information, be vigilant about unfollowing them.  It's only a helpful tool if you are reducing the noise from the unhelpful ones.

The Misleading Hierarchy of Numbering and Pyramids

This week, I took a training for the Y because I want to teach some of their adult health classes.  In this course, there was a section call...